Classifying Cryptocurrencies – A Comparative Analysis

Cryptocurrencies have revolutionized the way we perceive and use money. The decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies and the underlying blockchain technology have made them a popular alternative to traditional currencies. However, their unregulated nature has also led to concerns about their use in illicit activities such as money laundering and terrorism financing. In this article, we will compare the regulatory approaches of different countries towards cryptocurrencies, including the online trading platform which you will find on this site.

Image source:

Regulatory Approaches in the United States

The United States has taken a relatively strict approach towards cryptocurrencies, viewing them as a commodity rather than a currency. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have both taken action against companies offering cryptocurrency-related products that were not registered or were operating fraudulently. The IRS also views cryptocurrencies as property for tax purposes, meaning that capital gains taxes must be paid on profits made from selling or trading cryptocurrencies.

Regulatory Approaches in Europe

Europe has taken a more lenient approach towards cryptocurrencies, viewing them as a form of currency rather than a commodity. The European Union (EU) has issued guidelines on the regulation of cryptocurrencies, stating that they are not subject to value-added tax (VAT) when used as a means of payment. However, individual EU member states have taken differing approaches to regulating cryptocurrencies. For example, Germany has deemed cryptocurrencies as “private money”, while France views them as “digital assets”.

Regulatory Approaches in Asia

Asia has a mixed approach to regulating cryptocurrencies. Japan was one of the first countries to recognize cryptocurrencies as a legal form of payment, with the Japanese government issuing guidelines for the regulation of cryptocurrencies in 2017. However, China has taken a strict approach towards cryptocurrencies, banning initial coin offerings (ICOs) and cryptocurrency exchanges. India has also taken a tough stance towards cryptocurrencies, with the Reserve Bank of India banning banks from dealing with cryptocurrency exchanges in 2018.

Comparing Regulatory Approaches

The varying regulatory approaches towards cryptocurrencies can have a significant impact on their adoption and use. In countries with more lenient regulations, such as Germany and Japan, cryptocurrencies are more widely accepted as a means of payment. Conversely, in countries with stricter regulations, such as China and India, cryptocurrencies are less widely used.

One platform that has gained popularity for trading cryptocurrencies is Immediate Revolution. The online trading platform claims to use advanced algorithms to analyze market trends and provide accurate trading signals to users. However, users should be aware of the regulatory environment in their country before using the platform. For example, in countries such as China and India where cryptocurrencies are heavily regulated, the use of such a platform may be illegal.

The Role of International Organizations

The regulation of cryptocurrencies is not just the responsibility of individual countries. International organizations such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) also play a role in developing guidelines for the regulation of cryptocurrencies.

The FATF has issued guidelines for countries to prevent the use of cryptocurrencies for illicit activities such as money laundering and terrorism financing. The guidelines require cryptocurrency exchanges to implement know-your-customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) procedures, which are similar to those used by traditional financial institutions.

Similarly, the IOSCO has issued guidance on the regulation of cryptocurrencies, recommending that member states apply existing securities regulations to initial coin offerings (ICOs). The guidance also recommends that member states require cryptocurrency exchanges to adhere to the same regulatory requirements as traditional exchanges.


In conclusion, the regulatory approaches towards cryptocurrencies vary widely between countries. While some countries have taken a lenient approach towards cryptocurrencies, others have implemented strict regulations to prevent their use in illicit activities.

International organizations such as the FATF and IOSCO also play a role in developing guidelines for the regulation of cryptocurrencies, ensuring that they are not used for illicit activities. As cryptocurrencies continue to gain popularity, countries need to strike a balance between promoting innovation and protecting consumers and the financial system.

It is also important for users to be aware of the regulatory environment in their country before using online trading platforms such as Immediate Revolution. Users should ensure that the platform is operating legally and that they are complying with all relevant regulations.

Liked it? Take a second to support Victor Rouă on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.